Stock reports and daily ideas.
Two speeds on one category: the chart of the day — a single name with its level, trigger and invalidation — and the long-form company deep-dive behind it, with the valuation, the unit economics and the competitive risk.
One daily idea live, three deep-dives in progress.
A daily idea is a level and a timeframe. A deep-dive is why the company deserves the level in the first place. They publish on different clocks and are never presented as the same thing.
One name, two speeds, part by part.
The first three parts are the daily idea and they fit on one screen. The last two are what turns it into a deep-dive, and they take weeks.
The level
A zone with a timeframe, not a price. Published before entry so it cannot be adjusted afterwards.
The trigger
What has to happen for the idea to exist at all — a reclaim, a volume condition, a close above.
The invalidation
The price that ends it. Written down at the same time as the trigger, never negotiated later.
The company
Deep-dive only — unit economics stated in rupees, valuation with the assumptions exposed rather than summarised.
The risk
What would break the thesis, named in the body of the report rather than hedged into a footnote.
A daily idea and a deep-dive are not the same claim.
Every category here is written to the same four rules — a trigger, an invalidation, a size frame and a review. These three are specific to this one.
The daily idea carries a level, not a target
A trigger, an invalidation and a timeframe. No price target, no holding period, no implied conviction beyond what the chart actually shows.
The deep-dive carries the numbers
Sum-of-parts or DCF with the assumptions exposed, unit economics stated in rupees, and the competitive risk named rather than hedged into a footnote.
The risk is named, not softened
Every report states what would break the thesis and what the position is worth as a fraction of risk. A stock report without a stated downside is a brochure.